Tag: Mayor Pro-Tem Darla Reppe

09/07/2023 A Voice From the Gallery

Attacks by bullies and religious bullies.  As I stated in an earlier posting of my blog, “…I will not quote the Bible.  I will not quote the Bible to bolster any argument, to defend my personal opinion, to justify any actions I take or any actions I do not take, bully another person or to put someone down because they dare exercise freedom of speech…”  What I have learned in my lifetime in Spirit Lake (the summer-time door-to-door bangers who were looking for their salvation through badgering donations from the residents of Spirit Lake), Woonsocket (rural door-to-door religious door bangers who walked into my farm home while I was away and left their coupon for salvation on my kitchen counter) and Alcester (again the summer-time door-to-door evangelists from the deep south who wanted to share their printed handout) is to watch out for the religious bullies.  Religious bullies who quote bits and pieces of the Bible, taking those bits and pieces out of context to use against me or others with whom they disagree.  The advice I would give is to avoid these religious bullies but unfortunately, bullies do not go away and they won’t leave you alone unless you do something about it. 

I learned in first grade at five (5) years old that a warning did not make Carl a second-grader stop bullying me.  This school yard bully stood a head taller than me had me backed-up against a school yard fence, refusing to let me go and who I warned I was going to “sock-him-in-the nose if he did not let me go.  He didn’t and I did.  He ran to the teacher in charge of recess (who was a disciplinarian) holding he nose and bawling that I hit him.  She came to me and asked why?  I told her the truth.  The boy did confirm what he had done to me and the teacher scolded him in front of me.  The lesson I learned, tell the truth but always be ready to follow up in convincing a bully to leave you alone. So, with that said I will share with you folks my recent batch of hate mail from anonymous porch pulpiteers with my commentary.

Also I would note that while I post these with the notation Coward #1 and so-on, several of these missives are from the same individual porch “postulate.” So I presume this group of Brethren of the Order of the White Feather has a small membership.

COWARD #9.1 AND 9.2 Appear to be from the same coward. Note the similarity of handwriting and the failure to get the zip code correct not once but twice.

COWARD #10 Makes the statement, “…she, … are praying for me, Makes me kind of wonder, Praying for What?

COWARD #11 Now folks this consitutes a threat against me, I have already talked to law enforcement and the post office officials. Now folks you can see why I have chosen to publish these missives of mistruths. You are correct in one thing sugar, people need to know WHO YOU are and indeed they can consider the source; a bottle bottomer, a pretentious, pious, porch profit or a Bible tympanist.

COWARD #12 Good People? Let’s see on-going criminality in a city office? Your idea of good people defies logic. Really? So how is your mirror image?

COWARD #13 We? Who? You and the turd you carry in your pocket and use for an ID? How did that photo turn out? And so, what is your reputation besides being a voting member brethren of the Order of the White Feather?

COWARD #14 Well congratulations Coward #14 if you do not like bullies, how do YOU face yourself in the morning while you shave? H-m-m-m You state you read my blog and it was hard for you to read. Well sugar, it is not written for children.

COWARD #15 Oyea, here they come. Honey ya’ll needed to have filled this little two-question test out before you sent it, to let me know what your answers revealed to YOU darlin’. I suggest you stick with the plastic bag of popcorn and a video you can hang on door knobs idea.

COWARD #16 Hey COWARD #16, do you want your stamp back. I see the post office missed cancelling the stamp on that little folded up missive of yours. Folks this missive measured three (3) inches by Five (5) inches all folded up with the stamp and cutesy little self-stick stickers. Oh-Oh you ended your suggestion with a preposition.

COWARD #17 GEE another postcard, ya gotta be a running out of those little buggers along with your floral forever stamps. Ah folks…Hoping now not Praying…must have a long ride and no bathroom stops.

08/16/2023 A Voice From the Gallery

“Never trust the translation or interpretation of something without first trusting its interpreter.” ~ Suzy Kassem*

*150 QUOTES BY SUZY KASSEM [PAGE – 2] | A-Z Quotes. (n.d.). A-Z Quotes. https://www.azquotes.com/author/54644-Suzy_Kassem?p=2

Folks please forgive the delay in publishing this Video, processing a 3 hour, 20 minute video took more time than usual

The August 16, 2023, regular meeting of the Alcester City Council was called to order by Mayor pro-tem Darla Reppe with the following council members present Councilman Kerry Hedden, Councilman Brian Johnson, Councilwoman Julia Sundstrom, Councilwoman Cyndi Peeples with Councilwoman Kendra Hatle taking part via telephone until she could attention in person in the council room.  City Attorney Sam Nelson was also present, in person at the meeting.  The council and the gallery recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

Agenda Item #3 – Approve the agenda was addressed with a “point of order called” which concerned Agenda Item #4 Mayoral interviews.  The point of order addressed the open issue of duly elected Mayor Lukas Driesen, his document of resignation and the document of his rescission of resignation and the legally of proceeding to interview any potential mayoral candidates.  City Attorney Sam Nelson addressed the council and gallery regarding a legal opinion and the threat of the city’s liability insurance carrier continuing to provide liability insurance to the city. (00:12:12.) Mr. Nelson addressing the job that Mayor Lukas, “…from a posistion of impartiality…Mr. Driesen has done a fine job…”)

Questions to Mr. Nelson regarding his opinion from the council and the gallery were addressed and discussed.  The agenda approval was ultimately voted on in the affirmative.

Agenda Item #4 – Public Input – Pastor Scott Connor addressed the council with questions.  Mrs. Trudy Hedden addressed the council with her question, “…can Lukas be re-appointed” and the answer she received was Yes, Lukas Driesen can be re-appointed as Mayor.  

Agenda Item #5 – General Policies Discussion by Vickie Larsen  I addressed the council with concerns, changes in policy to make managing city business and departments more efficient, changing finance procedures and billing form requests from certain vendors of the city to identify specific costs in order to cut costs and eliminate certain fees to have a more realistic budget and dig ourselves out of the hole of over-spending as the past twelve years of dubious, opaque spending. *

* my notes will appear on the blog.

Agenda Item #6 – Community Center- Landon shared with the council the Community Center is losing money being open on Mondays with no appreciable up-tic in the future.  This is due to lack of staff and customer patronage.  

Discussions for carpet cleaning, advertising for part-time bartenders and servers, rental double booking fiasco, walk-through dealing with failures of completion, failures of workmanship of the building, and safety issues with course trees.

Agenda Item #7 – Police Department – No imperative updates.  Report that the National Night Out event went well.

Agenda Item #8 – Legal Updates – Sam. Discussion on property line Setback ordinances, Fencing restrictions, Council-at-large representation as opposed to Ward delinations and Appointment of Abigail Moore and Darla Reppe as authorized officials to act on behalf of the City of Alcester pursuant to Ordinances.

Agenda Item #9 – HRC signature on paperwork for HRC  Mayor Pro-Tem Reppe signed document in front of City Attorney Sam Nelson.

Agenda Item #10 – Wass Funeral Home request for two handicapped parking places in front of their establishment on Second street.  The Council voted to designate two handicapped spaces with possible discussion on designation of signage costs

Agenda Item #11 – Camera Quotes and Decisions.  Discussion took place but no action was taken until more information was available about the number of cameras needed and the capacity of coverage was determined.

Agenda Item #12 – Old Clubhouse Discussion.  Any action on this item was tabled due to whether the council really wanted to undertake the costs of refurbishing versus removing the building retaining ownership and control of the property for future city development and usage.

Agenda Item #13 – Banner Engineering with Tanya Miller via telephone.  Ms. Miller went over re-assessments, $8200.00 charge plus taxes (not to exceed) completion of Engineering Services for the hourly amount including reimbursement expenses plus taxes. Motion was made to approve, passed. Discussion to approve paying Banner Associates $9547.37 already due. Motion was made to approve payment and was approved.

Agenda Item #14 – Pool  Discussion on ongoing issues of the facility and pool which in the long run, would it be cheaper to repair, replace or decommission.

Agenda Item #15 – Finance Office 

Budget preparation by Councilwoman Kendra Hatle.  Note here:  a completed budget due date for city approval is September 1st.   As I understand it, absolutely no work had been started on the budget by former Finance Officer Patricia.  Councilwoman Hatle has been trying to make sense of the hot-mess, failure to maintain common sense, transparent bookkeeping for our city books. Councilwoman Hatle has spent many hours trying to make sense of non-sense.  I believe at the completion of her task, she should be rewarded with monetary compensation for taking this task on.

The council has agreed to contract with a neighboring community’s Finance Officer to come and assist Councilwoman Hatle and Assistant Finance Officer Abigail find their way through the chaos of our city books and to effect regular transparent bookkeeping methods and policies.

Yet another indemnification of Mayor Lukas’ RIGHT to Fire Patricia Jurrens as Alcester Finance Officer and for the Alcester City Council to UNANIMOUSLY approve the termination of Patricia Jurrens. Another note here is albeit hearsay that, “…Ms. Jurrens apparently has been verbally maintaining she voluntarily quit…”  If that is the case, it is my understanding that one cannot apply for unemployment if she/he quits.  It is my information Ms. Jurrens has applied for unemployment…all the while she claimed Mr. Nyreen voluntarily quit and apparently took steps to see to it Mr. Nyreen’s application for unemployment.  Mr. Nyreen was fired, Ms. Jurrens was fired so how is it that Mr. Nyreen who was FIRE was denied unemployment due to a claim he voluntarily quit but Ms. Jurrens who was also FIRED claims she voluntarily quit yet she files for unemployment?  Really?

Question of the compensation for Councilwoman Cyndi Peeples for her volunteering to cover for the vacation related absence of Assistant Finance Officer Abigail Moore.  The council voted to monetarily compensate Councilwoman Peeples but the amount of compensation was placed on hold until an opinion was offered by City Attorney Sam Nelson.

There was a question from the council regarding the presence of FORMER FINANCE OFFICER Pat Jurrens in the city offices behind the counter while Councilwoman Cyndi Peeples was in charge of the city offices.  According to the answer, Ms. Jurrens came in looking for a paper for the library. Why didn’t the Librarian request the document and have it emailed?  Why was she allowed access to city documents and allowed to walk over and just help herself to city documents?  She no longer has ANY RIGHTS to actively accessing city filing systems or protected documents!

Agenda Item #17 –  Executive Session (if Needed) was called.  Immediately a motion from Councilwoman Cyndi Peeples called for an executive session to discuss personnel and that a police officer remain (curious). SDCL 1-25-2 (1) Personnel  This motion violated open meeting law because given the action taken immediately upon exit of the council from Executive Session was the acceptance of the two resignation documents received from Councilman Kyle VandenHul and Mayor Lukas Driesen did not comply with the specific requirements mandated by definition of closed session South Dakota Open Meeting Statute.  This discussion was merely the acceptance of only two of the three documents already received from duly elected Mayor and Councilman.  Therefore because the motion was a violation of executive session statute by barring public participation, depriving the public from input and any discussion of the subject matter and discussion of decision to the acceptance of only two of the three documents received by the council along with the concluding vote.  All decisions and votes are invalid because the Executive Session violated South Dakota Open Meetings Law.

Agenda Item #18 – Council was adjourned at 9:42 p.m